The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
W.P.No.1029 of 2018 and WMP No.1250 of 2018 Sri Sri Yaadav Gosala Public Charitable Trust, Rep. by its Founder Ch. Srinivasa Yadav. ... Petitioner
vs. 1. Union of India, Rep. by its Cabinet Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 004.
WRIT Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in office order No.D/15020/119/2017-RD, dated 29.12.2017 quash the
same and has to be illegal and further give the direction directing the 3rd respondent impugned extension order has to be kept in abeyance and to make over additional charge to any one of the Officers of Ministry of Ayush or any other suitable arrangement for the interest of the administration.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subramanian
ORDER
(Order of the Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J)
Mr.R.Subramanian, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. He has made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar ars To
W.P.No.1029 of 2018 and WMP No.1250 of 2018
GMI(CO) TR(06/02/2018)
Sri Sri Yaadav Gosala Public Charitable Trust
Union of India
S. Manikumar
V. Bhavani Subbaroyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
