Dismissed

K.K.Ramesh, v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC7 Feb 2018WMP(MD)/2629/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed a miscellaneous application seeking an interim stay on bus fare hike proceedings. The court held that the interim prayer was beyond the scope of the main Writ Petition tendered for disposal as such.

What did the court decide?

Interim prayer for stay on bus fare hike proceedings was rejected as beyond the scope of the main Writ Petition.

K.K.Ramesh, Vs the State of Tamilnadu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Seventh day of February Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.HEMALATHA

¶6

WMP(MD) No.2629 of 2018

¶7

IN WP(MD) No.2435 of 2018

¶8

K.K.RAMESH, ... PETITIONER

¶9

¶10

1 THE STATE OF TAMILNADU

¶11

REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, FORT ST.GEORGE

¶12

SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI 600 009

¶13

2 THE STATE OF TAMILNADU

¶14

REP. BY ITS HOME SECRETARY, FORT.ST.GEORGE, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI 600 009

¶15

3 THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

¶16

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, FORT ST.GEORGE, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI 600 009

¶17

4 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

¶18

TAMILNADU, CHENNAI. ... RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to issue Stay the proceeding of 3rd respondent of bus fare hike pending disposal of the WP.

¶20

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.K.K.RAMESH -PARTY-IN-PERSON, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.A.K.BASKARA PANDIAN, Special Government Pleader for the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶21

In the considered opinion of this Court, interim prayer sought for by the petitioner is beyond the scope of the main Writ Petition and therefore, this Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

1 THE CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE OF TAMILNADU FORT ST.GEORGE SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI 600 009

¶26

2 THE HOME SECRETARY, STATE OF TAMILNADU FORT.ST.GEORGE, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI 600 009

¶27

3 THE SECRETARY, STATE OF TAMIL NADU TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, FORT ST.GEORGE, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI 600 009

¶28

4 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TAMILNADU, CHENNAI.

¶29

GJM/PM/PN/SAR-2-15.2.18-2P-5C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.K.Ramesh, v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.K.Ramesh, v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Member Secretary Vs Muthuraman

Chokkar Vs the Supperintendent of Police

The Managing Director Vs S.Sahul Hameed

The Chairman, Vs S.Hema Latha

Dheivam, Vs the District Collector

S.Karuppiah Vs the Secretary to Government