The Madras High Court condoned a delay of 2582 days in filing a petition to restore a writ petition seeking quashing of orders and grant of a mini bus permit, subject to payment of Rs.1000/- to the Chief Justice Relief Fund within a week.
Delay of 2582 days was condoned subject to payment of Rs.1000/- to the Chief Justice Relief Fund within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of August Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU
WMP(MD) No.16554 of 2018 IN WP(MD) No.14646 of 2010
USHA RANI ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
1 THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI.
2 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PUDUKKOTTAI.
3 S.MANOHARAN, PROPRIETOR,
KAMALAM TRANSPORT, 6 262/1 DR. NO.6, NEW STREET, THIRUGOKARNAM, PUDUKKOTTAI. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 2582 days in filing the petition to restore the WP(MD)NO.14646 of 2010 as against the 3rd respondent.
Prayer in WP(MD).14646/2010 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Ref.51666/B2/009 dated /04/2010 quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to grant mini bus permit to the petitioner for the route Pudukottai Thilagar Thidal to Mangudi Panchayat Board office Kovilpatti, Palaniyappan Nagar, Balan Nagar, Rajavayal, Vadamalappur, Ellaipatti, Sellugudi, Sirunjunai, Mettupatti and Marayapatti based on the directions of the 1st respondent.
ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.S.RAVEEKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.D.MURUGANANDAN, Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2,the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ court made the following order:-
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 2582 days
2
in filing an application for restoration of the writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.14646 of 2010, as against the third respondent, which was dismissed for default on 02.08.2011.
sd/28/08/2018 / TRUE COPY /
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI.
2 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PUDUKKOTTAI.
COPY TO : THE SECTION OFFICER, ACCOUNTS SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
WMP(MD) No.16554 of 2018 IN
WP(MD) No.14646 of 2010 Date :28/08/2018 PK/RR/SAR-1/03.09.2018 : 2P/4C
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 2582 days in filing an application for restoration of the writ petition can be condoned.
Whether the cost of Rs.1000/- to the Chief Justice Relief Fund must be paid within one week.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Usha Rani
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chennai
The Regional Transport Authority, Pudukkottai
S. Manoharan
J. Nisha Banu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
