The petitioner sought vacation of an interim stay order granted on 16.09.2016 due to alleged non-compliance. The court found the petitioner had not deposited the required award amount as per the conditional interim order.
The petition to vacate the interim stay order is allowed. No further extension of the interim order is to be granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WMP NO.5394 OF 2018 IN WP.32388 OF 2016
M/S.GANESH CARTONS INDIA [ PETITIONER ] PVT LTD, REP BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, NO.871/ 1, LOTUS COLONY, THATHANKULAM ROAD, MADHAVARAM, CHENNAI-600 060
Vs
1 MICRO SMALL ENTERPRISES, FACILITATION, COUNCIL, REP BY CHAIRMAN, TAMIL NADU INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, GUINDY, CHENNAI
2 M/S.RAMRAJ INDUSTRIES, [ RESPONDENTS ] REP BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.RAJASEKAR, NO.68-B, M.C.ROAD, AMBUR, VELLORE DISTRICT.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to
To Vacate the Order of Interim Stay that has been granted in WP No.32388/2016 by this Honourable Court by its order dated 16.09.2016. (in WMP.No.5394/18) in WP.No.32388/16.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.V.S.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.D.THIRUMOORTHY Advocate on behalf of the 2nd respondent the court made the following order:-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted that the conditional order passed by this Court on 16.09.2016 had not been complied with. The writ petitioner has not deposited the award amount as per the condition imposed in the interim order.
In view of the non-compliance of the order of this Court, no further extention of interim order is to be granted. Accordingly, the vacate stay petition filed in WMP.No.5394 of 2018 in W.P.No.32388 of 2016, stands allowed.
-sd/-
24/04/2018
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
C.C. to M/S.V.S.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges
The Government Advocate, High Court, Madras - 104.
Order
in
WMP.5394/2018
in
WP.32388/2016
Date :24/04/2018
From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format SDR 26.04.2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim stay order granted on 16.09.2016 requiring deposit of the award amount should be extended given the petitioner's non-compliance.
M/S.Ganesh Cartons India Pvt Ltd
Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council
M/S.Ramraj Industries
Sm Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
