Senthilkumar v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition seeking an interim stay of a service removal order, the court dismissed the petition because the petitioner had already been removed from service.
What did the court decide?
No interim stay granted; petition dismissed as the petitioner was already removed from service.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of December Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
WMP.NO.32933 OF 2018
IN WP.NO.28240 OF 2018
SENTHILKUMAR [ PETITIONER ]
EMPLOYEE NO.835083,
QUARTERS NO.738/ 02 ,
SOUTH COLONY, I.C.F., CHENNAI.
Vs
1 UNION OF INDIA, [ RESPONDENTS ]
THE GENERAL MANAGER, PERSONNEL BRANCH,
INTEGRAL COACH FACTORY,
SOUTHERN RAILWAY,
CHENNAI.
2 THE ESTATE OFFICER AND CHIEF
ENGINEER, INTEGRAL COACH FACTORY,
SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI.
3 THE SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER,
INTEGRAL COACH FACTORY,
SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI.
4 THE REGISTRAR,
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
MADRAS BRANCH, CHENNAI.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to
grant an order of ad-interim stay of operation of the order No. PB/ S/ DAR/ 835083/ UA dated 24.06.2016 passed by the 1st respondent (in WMP.No.32933/18) pending disposal of the above writ petition 28240/18.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Senthilkumar
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
M.M. Sundresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court