Chairman Tamil Nadu v. M.Rajapandian
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ appeal challenging appointment order dismissed as infructuous since the respondent was already given the appointment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
W.A.[MD].No.572 of 2018 and
C.M.P(MD)Nos.3227 and 3228 of 2018
Chennai - 4.
Vs.
M.Rajapandian : Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 16.04.2013 made in W.P.(MD).No.5975 of 2013, on the file of this Court.
Prayer in WP(MD)No.5975/ 2013 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Grade II Police Constable as per Registration No.2504420 in common Recruitment of Grade II Police Constables/Grade-II/Jail Wardens/ Firemen-2012 in Advertisement No.112, issued by the 1st respondent within the time fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
For Appellants : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan Special Government Pleader
For Respondent : Mr.S.T.Sasidharan Tamilkani https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice]
Since the respondent/writ petitioner has been given appointment, the proceedings have become infructuous and the writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CO)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
| 1. The Chairman, |
|---|
| Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, 807, P.D.Lee Chengalvarayar Naicker Malligai, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2. |
| 2. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai - 4. |
| 3. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. |
| NB/RSB TE/RSK/SAR-2 : 08/05/2018 : 2P/4C |
| JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.[MD].No.572 of 2018 and C.M.P(MD)Nos.3227 and 3228 of 2018 06.04.2018 |
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board
The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu
The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District
M.Rajapandian
Indira Banerjee
J.Nisha Banu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court