Disposed

Allinagaram Devendhirakula v. the Superintendent of

Madras HC26 Mar 2018WA(MD)/465/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of a writ appeal filed to set aside an order rejecting a festival application. The court noted that an amicable settlement was reached between the disputing groups, allowing both to conduct the festival on separate dates. Consequently, the appeal was closed with no further orders.

What did the court decide?

The writ appeal stands closed with no further orders as an amicable settlement was reached.

Allinagaram Devendhirakula Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.03.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN and

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA W.A.(MD)No.465 of 2018 and

¶6

C.M.P.(MD)No.2785 of 2018

¶7

Allinagaram Devendhirakula Uravin Murai, Represented through its President, M.K.Muniyandi (M-60/18), S/o. Karuppiah, Ambedhkar Street, Allinagaram,

¶8

Theni District. : Appellant Vs.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Theni.

¶10

The Inspector of Police, Allinagaram Police Station, Theni.

¶11

Allinagaram Devendhirakula Uravin Murai, Represented through its President, V.Subbaiyan, S/o. Velappan, Ambedhkar Street, Allinagaram, Theni District.

¶12

: Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 14.03.2018 in W.P(MD).No.5109 of 2018.

¶14

Prayer in WP(MD). 5109/ 2018 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned order of the 2nd respondent dated 22.02.2018 and quash the as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner to conduct and celebrate the Pankuni Urchavam Vizha from 27.03.2018 to 03.04.2018 at Arulmigu Sri Sadayandi, Sri.Mandukaruppasamy, Sri.Kaleeswari and Sri.Sellandiamman Thirukovil, Allinagaram, Theni.

¶15

For Appellant : Mr.C.M.Arumugam https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian Special Government Pleader

JUDGMENT

******************

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J. ]

¶20

The matter in issue pertains to “Panguni Urchavam Thiruvila” between 27.03.2018 and 03.04.2018 and since there is a dispute between the petitioner Sangam and the third respondent Sangam, which also have a similar name and taking into consideration the law and order problem, request for conducting the festival came to be rejected by the second respondent vide impugned order dated 22.02.2018.

¶21

2.The writ appeal was entertained and notices were ordered and when it was listed for hearing on 23.03.2018, Mr.C.M.Arumugam, learned counsel appearing for the appellant prayed for time to find out an amicable settlement between the two groups, namely, the petitioner and the third respondent Sangam. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be called on 26.03.2018 (today).

¶22

3.The writ appeal is listed today and the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has produced the proceedings dated 23.03.2018, which would disclose that a Peace Committee Meeting was conducted by the District Revenue Officer, Theni, wherein both groups have participated and an amicable settlement has also been reached. The terms of the settlement are:

¶23

(i)“Panguni Urchavam Thiruvila” for the year 2018 is to be celebrated by the Sangam headed by Mr.V.Subbaiyan, between 03.04.2018 and 06.04.2018 (4 days) and the Sangam headed by Mr.M.K.Muniyandi, is to conduct the festival between 09.04.2018 and 12.04.2018 (4 days).

¶24

(ii)both groups shall obtain necessary permissions separately from the jurisdictional police.

¶25

(iii)both groups undertake to conduct the festival in a peaceful manner without violating law and order and public order.

¶26

4.The said understanding was also reduced into writing and signed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Theni, Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, District Revenue Officer, Theni, Tahsildar, Theni as well as by the persons belonging to Mr.V.Subbaiyan's group and Mr.M.K.Muniyandi's group.

¶27

5.The xerox copy of the said proceedings dated 23.03.2018, submitted before this Court is taken on file and record. In the light of the same, no further orders are necessary in this writ appeal.

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6.The writ appeal stands closed, accordingly. However, it is made clear that the parties to the said agreement for

¶29

¶30

understanding shall fully comply with the terms of the said undertaking and if any infraction is noted, and in the event of law and order and public order problem, the jurisdictional revenue officials as well as police officials are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶33

/True Copy/

¶34

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶35

¶36

The Superintendent of Police, Theni.

¶37

The Inspector of Police, Allinagaram Police Station, Theni.

¶38

+1cc to Mr.C.M.Arumugam, Advocate SR.No.57894

¶39

¶40

VB/SV/MMS/SAR4/02.04.2018/3P/4C

¶41

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)No.465 of 2018 26.03.2018

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Allinagaram Devendhirakula v. the Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Allinagaram Devendhirakula v. the Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Sree Devi, Vs the District Collector

The Sivakasi Co-Operative Vs a.L.Muthukumari

A. Bama @ Sathiya Bama Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Tharahai Cuthbert, Vs the District Collector

The District Collector, Vs Kuraisa Beevi(Died)

A. Bakthinathan, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu