Disposed

S.Syed Mohemmed Enayadullah, v. the Tamil Nadu Public Service

Madras HC13 Dec 2018WA(MD)/1562/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench dismissed the writ appeal seeking appointment as Junior Assistant. The court directed the appellant to report to the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, by 02.01.2019, for joining at the Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankoil, subject to acceptance by the Judge who may post him in any court within jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

Directed the appellant to report to Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, by 02.01.2019 for joining; the Judge may post the appellant in any court within jurisdiction.

S.Syed Mohemmed Enayadullah, Vs the Tamil… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 13.12.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.A.(MD)No.1562 of 2018 and

¶7

CMP(MD) Nos.11114 and 11115 of 2018

¶8

S.Syed Mohemmed Enayadullah

¶9

.. Appellant

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, rep.by its Secretary, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 03.

¶12

State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by the Secretary, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶13

The District Educational Officer, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. .. Respondents

¶14

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act Writ Appeal against the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.16251 of 2012 dated 08.02.2018.

¶15

Prayer in WP(MD)No.16251 of 2012 :

¶16

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to consider the petitioners appointment as a Junior Assistant in the department of respondent NO.2 at Pudhukotai District and consequently directing the respondent No.3 to permit the Petitioner to continue with the school namely Government High school, Gandhinagar, Pudukottai District as Junior Assistant, which comes under the control of the respondent No.3 till such decision and pass any further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ case and thus render justice.

¶17

¶18

For R1

¶19

For Appellant : Mr.T.Thirumurugan For R1 : Mr.K.K.Senthil For R2 & R3 : Mrs.S.Srimathi

¶20

JUDGMENT

¶21

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J. ]

¶22

The writ petition filed by the appellant for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission to consider his appointment as a Junior Assistant in the Department of School Education and permit him to continue his employment with the Government High School, Gandhinagar was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant has come up with this intra-court appeal.

¶23

2.The appellant was initially appointed as a Junior Assistant in the Government High School, Gandhinagar, Pudukottai. It was a temporary appointment. The appellant appeared for the civil examination conducted by the Public Service Commission. The appellant was selected by the Commission and he was allotted to the judicial department. The Principal District Judge passed an order appointing the appellant as a Junior Assistant attached to the Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankoil. The appellant failed to join and made an attempt to continue as a Junior Assistant at the Government High School, Gandhinagar. Since the request was not considered by the third respondent, the appellant has filed the writ petition for a direction to the authorities to permit him to continue as a Junior Assistant at the Government High School, Gandhinagar.

¶24

3.When it was put to the appellant as to how he can maintain the writ petition for a mandamus to continue his appointment as a Junior Assistant, inspite of his appointment on substantive basis at the Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankoil, the appellant filed an affidavit, agreeing to join at the transferred place.

¶25

4.We therefore, directed the learned Standing Counsel for the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission to take instructions as to whether the post is still available. The learned Standing Counsel submitted that the appointment has not been cancelled and it will be open to the appellant to join at the Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankoil. The appellant also agreed to join as a Junior Assistant in the Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankoil.

¶26

5.The appellant is stated to be taking treatment at National Institute of Siddha Ayothidoss Pandithar Hospital, Chennai. The appellant seeks four weeks time to join. The appellant must report https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ before the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli on 02 January, 2019. The Principal District Judge shall accept his joining. It is

¶27

¶28

open to the District Judge to post the appellant as a Junior Assistant in any of the Courts within his jurisdiction. We make it clear that this order would not stand in the way of the appellant from taking appropriate action for his retention in the District of Pudukottai.

¶29

6.The writ appeal is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, CMP(MD) Nos.11114 and 11115 of 2018 are closed.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

Assistant Registrar (Writs)

¶32

/True Copy/

¶33

Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-IV)

¶34

¶35

The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 03.

¶36

The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶37

The District Educational Officer, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

¶38

Copy To:-

¶39

The Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli.

¶40

1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 100529 + 1 CC TO Mr.T.THIRUMURUGAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 100133 + 1 CC TO Mr.K.K.SENTHIL, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 100399

¶41

¶42

TE/PM/SAR-4 : 26/12/2018 : 3P/8C

¶43

W.A.(MD)No.1562 of 2018 13.12.2018

¶44

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Syed Mohemmed Enayadullah, v. the Tamil Nadu Public Service

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Syed Mohemmed Enayadullah, v. the Tamil Nadu Public Service

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Valliammai, Vs the Authorised Officer

Kannan Vs the District Collector

S.P.Kannan, Vs the Commissioner

V.Muraliganesh Vs the District Collector

The Secretary to Government, Vs G.S.Mohanavalli

K.K.Ramesh, Vs the Governemtn of India