Dismissed

The Govt., of Tamilnadu, v. R.Mayavan, S/O.Rasu

Madras HC23 Nov 2018WA/1073/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal preferred by Government authorities against the regularization of service granted to a school headmaster. The Bench held that the appellant suffered no cause of action as the respondent had already received the benefits sought.

What did the court decide?

The writ appeal stands dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition dismissed. No costs.

The Govt., of Tamilnadu, Vs R.Mayavan, S/O.Rasu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.11.2018 CORAM

¶2

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and

¶3

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶4

W.A.No.1073 of 2013

¶5

& M.P.No.1 of 2013

¶6

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary, Registration Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶7

2.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai 600 004.

¶8

3.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar office of Kizhppavoor, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.

¶9

4.The Chief Educational Officer, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.

¶10

5.The District Educational Officer, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.

¶11

6.The Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Elakurichi Post, Ariyualur, Ariyalur District. ... Appellants Vs. R.Mayavan ... Respondent

¶12

Writ Appeal is preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 11.07.2012 made in W.P.No.17831 of 2012.

¶13

WP.No.17831/2012 & MP 1/2012:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the petitioners service based on the G.O.Ms.No.22 P and AR Department dated 28.2.2006 as well as petitioners representation on 19.6.2012 and direct the respondents herein to regularize the petitioners service on his completion of 10 years of service from the date of initial appointment with all benefits in terms of order in W.A.No.230 of 2009 dated 3.8.09 passed by the Division Bench of this

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Honourable Court and W.P.No.20662 of 2010 dated 15.9.2010.

¶16

For Appellants : Mr.C.Munusamy,

¶17

Special Government Pleader

¶18

For respondent : Mr.V.Krishnamurthy

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

(Judgment of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH,J.)

¶21

When the writ appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellants would submit that the issue has already been dealt with by the Apex Court, in which benefits have been granted to those persons, who have been given the benefits already and further holding that they should not be disturbed. In the case on hand, it is submitted by the learned Special Government Pleader that the respondent has got all the benefits.

¶22

In view of the above submission, the writ appeal stands
dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
raa
To
1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu,
Registration Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Inspector General of Registration,
Santhome High Road, Santhome,
Chennai 600 004.
3.The Sub-Registrar,
Sub-Registrar office of Kizhppavoor,
Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.
4.The Chief Educational Officer,
Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.
5.The District Educational Officer,
Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

6.The Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Elakurichi Post, Ariyualur, Ariyalur District.

¶25

+1cc to Mr.V.Krishnamurthy Advocate, S.R.No. 80086

¶26

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 80955

¶27

W.A.No.1073 of 2013

¶28

VSN II(CO) GN(19/12/2018)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Govt., of Tamilnadu, v. R.Mayavan, S/O.Rasu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Govt., of Tamilnadu, v. R.Mayavan, S/O.Rasu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Ranganathan Vs the Secretary to Govt

M. Therasa Arutha Mary Vs T. Thulsaiah

The Accountant - General (a&E) Vs K.Kolandaivel, Minnampalli

D.Mubarak Vs the Honourable 1ST Addl Family

R.Gunasekar, Vs The Government of India

The State of Tamilnadu Vs K. Elangovan