Disposed

T.Gunasekar v. S.Poornima

Madras HC11 Dec 2018TR CMP/804/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge allowed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 CPC. Upon consent of both parties, the case pending in Family Court, Dharmapuri was transferred to Subordinate Court, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2018 from Family Court, Dharmapuri to Subordinate Court, Palacode, Dharmapuri District and transmission of records within two weeks.

T.Gunasekar Vs S.Poornima — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 11.12.2018 CORAM:

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. PONGIAPPAN Transfer CMP. No.804 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.19804 of 2018

¶3

T.Gunasekar Petitioner/1^st Respondent Vs

¶4

1.S.Poornima 1^st Respondent / Petitioner 2.Jeyanthi 2^nd Respondent / 2^nd respondent

¶5

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of the Civil Procedure to withdraw the case H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2018 pending on the file of the Family Court, Dharmapuri and to transfer the same to the Subordinate Court, Tambaram.

¶6

For Petitioner : Mr.Vasudevan I.C.

¶7

For Respondents : Mr.P.Valliappan for R1 Mr.Titus Enock for R2

¶8

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of the Civil Procedure to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2018 pending on the file of the Family Court, Dharmapuri and to transfer the same to the Subordinate Court, Tambaram.

¶9

Mr.J.Titus Enock, the learned Counsel takes notice for the second respondent. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent No.1 and 2 are present. Actually, as per the pleadings in the petition, first respondent is the contesting respondent. During the time of enquiry, both the counsel appearing for the petitioner and the first respondent consented for transferring the proceedings from the Family Court, Dharmapuri to Palacode, Dharmapuri District, in this regard both of them made an endorsement to that effect.

¶10

Accordingly, in view of the endorsement made by either parties, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. The case in H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2018 is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Family Coourt, Dharmapuri and to transfer the same to the file of the Subordinate Court, Palacode, Dharmapuri District. The learned Family Court Judge, Dharmapuri is directed to transmit all the records pertaining to H.M.O.P.No.151 of

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

2018 to the file of the Subordinate Court, Palacode, Dharmapuri District, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of records, the learned Subordinate Judge, Palacode, Dharmapuri District is directed to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶13

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sbn
Index : Yes/No.
To
1. The Family Court, Dharmapuri.
2. The Subordinate Court,
Palacode,
Dharmapuri District.
+1cc to Mr.Vasudevan I.C. , Advocate SR.No. 85963
+1cc to Mr. P.Valliappan, Advocate SR.No. 85674
Transfer CMP. No.804 of 2018
and C.M.P.No.19804 of 2018
A.SK(30/01/2019)

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Gunasekar v. S.Poornima

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Gunasekar v. S.Poornima

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Aarthi Vs N. Balaji

Minor Poongavanam Vs Angamuthu

Sureka Vs M.Senguttuvan

Jayalakshmi Vs Balamurugan

A.N.Udhayabanu Vs a.Vignesh

P.Latha Vs M.Paramasivam