Seeranga Gounder v. Arul
Case brief
What is this about?
The court recorded evidence that the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the transfer petition in Namakkal. Consequently, the transfer petition was dismissed as withdrawn and connected petitions were closed.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw; Transfer petition dismissed as withdrawn; Connected petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25.10.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN Tr.C.M.P.No.771 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.19020 of 2018
1.Seeranga Gounder 2.Palaniyappan ...Petitioners Vs. Arul ...Respondent
Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw the suit in O.S.No.197 of 2015 pending on the file of the Principal District Court, Namakkal and transfer the same to any other District Courts in Namakkal District. For Petitioner : M/s.G.R.Sreemagal for Mr.S.Muthukrishnan O R D E R Counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the Transfer Miscellaneous petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.
In the light of the above position, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mfa To The Principal District Judge, Namakkal.
Tr.C.M.P.No.771 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.19020 of 2018 MP(CO) rrs 16/11/2018
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Seeranga Gounder
- petitioner
Palaniyappan
- respondent
Arul
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court