Allowed

N. Divya v. Dillikumar @ Vinoth

Madras HC8 Mar 2018TR CMP/697/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking to move a Hindu Marriage Act suit from Sub Court, Arakkonam to Sub Court, Thiruvallur. The transfer was granted based on the wife's residence and expenditure concerns under Section 19(iii-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

What did the court decide?

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition was allowed, and the matrimonial suit H.M.O.P.No.68 of 2017 was withdrawn from Sub Court, Arakkonam and transferred to Sub Court, Thiruvallur.

N. Divya Vs Dillikumar @ Vinoth — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.03.2018

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶5

Tr.C.M.P.No.697 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.13991 of 2017

¶6

N.Divya 2. N.Nandha Gopal 3. Manjula .. Petitioners -VsDilli Kumar @ Vinoth .. Respondent Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C praying to withdraw and transfer the above H.M.O.P.No.68 of 2017 on the file of the Sub Court, Arakkonam to the Sub Court, Thiruvallur.

¶7

For petitioner ... Mr.M.Md.Ibrahim Ali For respondent ... Mr.D.Dayalan O R D E R

¶8

The wife has filed this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking to transfer the H.M.O.P.No.68 of 2017 from the file of the Sub Court, Arakkonam to the file of the Sub Court, Thiruvallur.

¶9

The respondent-husband has filed the above H.M.O.P.No.68 of 2017 under Section 13(1) (IV) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the file of the Sub Court, Arakkonam for dissolution of marriage held between the petitioner and respondent on 15.09.2016.

¶10

In paragraph 7 of the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petitioner-wife has stated that she is living in Thiruvallur with her parents and she has no independent income for incurring travelling expenses to attend the Court hearing at Arakkonam. Further, it is stated that the respondent-husband is working as Constable in the Central Industrial Security Force. Hence, no prejudice would be caused to him, if the said H.M.O.P is transferred to Thiruvallur. Hence, she seeks for transfer.

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Considering the averments made in the petition and also the fact that Section 19 (iii-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act gives preference to the wife where she resides, this Court is inclined to transfer the said H.M.O.P.No.68 of 2017 pending on the file Sub Court, Arakkonam to Thiruvallur.

¶14

Accordingly, the Tr.C.M.P is allowed. H.M.O.P.No.68 of 2017 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Arakkonam is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Sub Court, Thiruvallur. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶15

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
srn
To
1. The Sub Court, Arakkonam
2. The Sub Court, Thiruvallur
+1 CC to Mr.M.Md.Ibrahim Ali, Advocate sr 17627.
Tr.C.M.P.No.697 of 2017
and C.M.P.No.13991 of 2017
MR(CO)
SP(06/04/2018)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N. Divya v. Dillikumar @ Vinoth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N. Divya v. Dillikumar @ Vinoth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Duraipandi Vs Motchiah

D.Savithri Vs P.Sundrarajan

Vimalasundari Ammal Vs Sundaram

Kangavalli Vs Shakthivelan

K.Janaki @ Suhasini Vs R.Chandramohan @ Balaji

Gomathi Vs Parasuraman