Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruppur. Thereafter, it is found that the respondents have laid different civil actions against the petitioner as abovestated based on the Will, settlement deeds etc., above referred to and accordingly, have claimed the relief of permanent injunction against the petitioner and it is also seen that the petitioner is disputing the alleged documents of title projected by the respondents for claiming the relief prayed for in the abovesaid suits laid by them. Inasmuch as the issues involved between the parties as regards the subject matter involved in the four suits are found to be more or less similar and also arising mainly between the petitioner and the respondents in the various civil actions and in such view of the matter, when the parties would be required to put forth the same evidence as regards the subject matter in all the four civil actions, in such view of the matter, if all the suits are jointly tried and determined by one and the same Court, as rightly put forth, the same would avoid conflict of decisions and furthermore, by way of the joint trial of the four civil suits by one and the same Court, the parties also would be required to adduce common evidence in all the matters and in such view of the position, it is seen that the consolidation of all the four suits and the joint trial and the determination of the four civil suits by one and the same Court would advance the cause of justice and by way of the same joint trial as prayed for, no serious prejudice is found to be caused to the respondents as such. Though it is contended by the respondents' counsel that only with a view to delay the proceedings, http://www.judis.nic.in
