Allowed

Mrs.K.Jeseena Begam v. Mr.M.Kalilrahman

Madras HC1 Oct 2018TR CMP/598/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a transfer petition under Section 24 CPC, moving a marital nullity suit from the Munsif Court at Palani to the Munsif Court at Pollachi. The court accepted the petitioner's residence, travel distance, and specific religious/inconvenience regarding travel alone as valid grounds, noting the respondent did not contest.

What did the court decide?

O.S.No.70 of 2018 withdrawn from Munsif Court, Palani and transferred to Munsif Court, Pollachi for disposal.

Mrs.K.Jeseena Begam Vs Mr.M.Kalilrahman — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

RESERVED ON : 27.09.2018 PRONOUNCED ON : 01.10.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN TR CMP.598/2018 and CMP.14444/2018 Mrs. K. Jeseena Begam ...Petitioner Vs. Mr. Kalilrahman ...Respondent Prayer: Transfer CMP is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to withdraw the proceedings in O.S.No.70 of 2018 pending on the file of Munsif Court, Palani and to transfer the same to Munsif Court, Pollachi. For Petitioner : Ms.V.S.Usha Rani For Respondent : No apperance. Set exparte vide order dated 27.09.2018 ORDER The petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking transfer of O.S.No.70 of 2018 laid by the respondent against her, pending on the file of Munsif Court, Palani and to transfer the same to the file Munsif Court, Pollachi for disposal.

¶3

It is seen that the respondent has laid a suit in O.S.No.70 of 2018 against the petitioner for declaring the marriage held between the respondent and the petitioner on 02.02.2017 at CDG Thirumana Mandabam, Palakadu Main Road, Pollachi, as null and void and for other reliefs. Seeking transfer of the abovesaid proceeding to Pollachi Court, the present petition has been laid by the petitioner on the footing that she is a resident of Pollachi, Coimbatore District and the distance between Pollachi and Palani Court is on the higher side and the petititioner is finding it difficult and inconvenient to attend the abovesaid proceeding at Palani Court on each and

¶4

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶5

every hearing date and furthermore, the petitioner, being a muslim lady, unable to travel alone without the help of her parents and also have to spend a considerable amount with reference to the same and accordingly sought for the transfer as prayed for.

¶6

In this matter, though the respondent had been served, he has not shown any endeavour to contest the transfer petition, accordingly, the respendent having been called, remaining absent, has been set exparte.

¶7

The petitioner has expressed certain inconveniece and hardship in attending the proceeding at Palani Court. The said reasonings projected by the petitioner have not been repudiated by the respondent by contesting the transfer claim of the petitioner. Thus, it is found that the petitioner has made out sufficient cause for effecting the transfer as prayed for. Furthermore, as rightly contended, the distance between the petitioner's residence and Palani Court is on the higher side. That apart, the petitioner, being a muslim lady, has got her own inhibitions and inconvenience in travelling alone to Palani court for defending the proceeding laid by the respondent against her. Furthermore, it is seen that the petitioner is depending upon her aged parents and accordingly they are also unable to assist her in travelling to Palani Court for defending the proceeding. Thus, it is found that, in all, the petitioner has made a valid cause for effecting the transfer and accordingly, it is seen that the respondent has also not thrown any challenge to the same by way of contesting the same. It is also seen that the respondent would also not be prejudiced in having the suit laid by him being conducted at Pollachi Court. Hence, the transfer petition is accepted.

¶8

For the reasons above stated, O.S.No.70 of 2018 is withdrawn from the file of Munsif Court, Palani, and transferred to the file of Munsif Court, Pollachi, for disposal as per law.

¶9

Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶10

Sd/-

¶11

Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶12

bga

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

¶15

The Munsif Court, Palani

¶16

The Munsif Court, Pollachi

¶17

+1cc to Mr.V.S.Usha Rani, Advocate, S.R.No.67626

¶18

TR CMP.598/2018 and CMP.14444/2018 MP(CO) GN(25/10/2018)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.K.Jeseena Begam v. Mr.M.Kalilrahman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.K.Jeseena Begam v. Mr.M.Kalilrahman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vs K.M. Ahamad Shah

Kullammal (Died) Vs Munusamy

P.R 2 Perambalur District Vs Minor J. Monizha

Gayathri Vs C.S. Ramnath

Lavanya Vs Prabhu

S.M. Gnanapriya Vs Sivabalan