Allowed

R.Abirami v. Vinothkumar, S/O Lakshmanan

Madras HC1 Mar 2018TR CMP/574/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner wife sought transfer of her husband's divorce petition from the Subordinate Court, Pattukottai to the Family Court, Chennai due to residency and travel difficulties. The High Court, considering the wife's convenience and disability under Section 19(iii-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, allowed the transfer to Chennai.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P.No.15 of 2017 from Subordinate Court, Pattukottai to the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

R.Abirami Vs Vinothkumar, S/O Lakshmanan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 01.03.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶5

Tr.C.M.P. No.574 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.12067 of 2017

¶6

R.Abirami ... Petitioner versus Vinothkumar ... Respondent Prayer:- The Petition is filed under Section 24 of C.P.C. praying to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.15 of 2017 from the file of the Sub Court, Pattukottai and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Chennai.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arulmozhi For Respondent : Mr.Bala Natarajan O R D E R

¶8

The petitioner/wife in the matrimonial dispute has filed this Transfer Miscellaneous Petition seeking to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.15 of 2017 filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act for divorce, pending on the file of Subordinate Court, Pattukottai and transfer the same to the file of Family Court, Chennai.

¶9

It is stated that the petitioner/wife has also filed M.C.No.485 of 2017, which is pending on the file of the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.

¶11

In paragraph 7 of the affidavit, it is stated that the respondent/husband is presently residing and working at Singapore and the petitioner/wife is residing at Chennai. She expressed her difficulty in travelling since the distance from Chennai to Pattukottai is 421 kms and the travelling time is around 8 hours either through bus or train. She is dependent on her parents for her day to day life and her aged father, who is

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

having health issues, could not travel with the petitioner. Further it is stated that the petitioner/wife had attended two hearings before the Subordinate Court, Pattukottai but the respondent/husband did not attend those two hearings. Hence, the petitioner/wife sought for the transfer.

¶14

Considering the grievances expressed by the petitioner and also Section 19(iii-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, which mandates that the convenience of the wife has to be considered, this Court is inclined to transfer H.M.O.P.No.15 of 2017 from the file of Subordinate Court, Pattukottai to the file of Family Court, Chennai.

¶15

Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed and H.M.O.P.No.15 of 2017, pending on the file of Subordinate Court, Pattukottai is transferred to the file of IV Additional Family Court, Chennai, to be tried along with M.C.No.485 of 2017. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶16

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rsi
To
1. The Subordinate Judge,
Pattukottai.
2. The IV Additional Family Judge,
Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.A.Arulmozhi, Advocate, S.R.No.15716
Tr.C.M.P. No.574 of 2017
and C.M.P.No.12067 of 2017
CS/19/04/18

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Abirami v. Vinothkumar, S/O Lakshmanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Abirami v. Vinothkumar, S/O Lakshmanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamalam Vs lakshmi

Mangilal Vs J.Javarilal Parekh

P.V. Gurappa Vs P. Pillappa

R. Jony Vs J. Densing S/O. Johnrose

R.Kanniappan,S/O.Perumal Vs K.Vasantha,W/O.R.Kanniappan

Perathu Selvi Vs Jagatheeswaramoorthy