Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income v. Smt v.J.Geetha

Madras HC5 Dec 2018TCA/455/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the tax appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax. The matter was disposed of as the tax effect was lower than the threshold limit mentioned in Circular No.3 of 2018. The substantial question of law framed was left open.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed and the Substantial Question of Law is left open. The Revenue may seek restoration if tax effect rises above the threshold limit.

The Commissioner of Income Vs Smt v.J.Geetha — Income Tax | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.12.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

Tax Case Appeal Nos.455 of 2011

¶6

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai.

¶7

...Appellant

¶8

-vs-

¶9

Smt.V.J.Geetha, B-1, Raaj Sesh Mahal, No.34, Bharathi Ula Road, Race Course Road, Madurai – 652 002.

¶10

...Respondent

¶11

Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 05.06.2009 in I.T.(SS).A No.35/Mds/2007, for the block period 1991-92 to 2000-01 and 2001-02.

¶12

As against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Madurai dated 23.11.2006 in I.T.A.No.198/2005-2006 as asgainst the order of Deputy Commissioner f Income Tax, Central Circle-III, madurai dated 09.07.2003 in Block Assessment period 1991-92 to 2000-2001 abd 2001-2002 (Oart) in PAN-GIR NO:AGIPG7073K

¶13

[Judgement of the Court was delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam, J.]

¶14

This Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 05.06.2009 in I.T.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

(SS).A No.35/Mds/2007, for the block period 1991-92 to 2000-01 and 2001-02.

¶17

2.Heard M/s.V.Pushpa, learned Counsel for the Revenue and Ms.V.J.Geetha, learned Counsel for the assessee.

¶18

3.This Appeal has been admitted on 20.10.2011, on the following Substantial Question of Law:

¶19

"Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer as undisclosed income, while framing the block assessment under Section 158-BC read with Section 158-BD is valid?”

¶20

4.We have perused the order of Assessment as well as the Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax and we find that the tax effect in this appeal is lesser than the threshold limit mentioned in Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which fixes the monetary limit as Rs.50,00,000/- for the Department to pursue the matter. Furthermore, the Revenue has not been able to point out any distinguishing features, by which the Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, cannot be applied.

¶21

5.Thus, for the above reasons, the Revenue cannot pursue this Appeal in view of the low tax effect. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed and the Substantial Question of Law, framed for consideration, is left open. No costs. The Revenue is at liberty to seek for restoration of appeal, if at a later point of time, it is found that the tax effect is above the threshold limit.

¶22

mrm/abr

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench.

¶26

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)II, Madurai.

¶27

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-III, No.2 V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai 625 002.

¶28

+1 cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate SR.No.83440

¶29

T.C.A.No.455 of 2011
NA(CO)
CSL/02.01.2019

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Commissioner of Income v. Smt v.J.Geetha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Commissioner of Income v. Smt v.J.Geetha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Wheels India Ltd.

Commissioiner of Income Tax Vs M/S Tenneco Rc India Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Simpson & Co. Ltd.

M/S.Safa Sea Foods Vs Joint Director

Commissioner of Income Tax-I Vs Dr.C.Natesan

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Mahaveer Bullion