Dismissed

Commissioiner of Income Tax IV v. Mr.M.N.Rajaraman

Madras HC1 Nov 2018TCA/177/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Tax Case Appeal by the Revenue against a penalty quashal by the tribunal. The appeal was dismissed because the tax effect fell below the monetary threshold limit specified in Circular No. 3 of 2008 (Rs. 50 lakh). The legal question was left open.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed, substantial question of law left open; Revenue at liberty to seek restoration if tax effect exceeds threshold.

Commissioiner of Income Tax IV Vs Mr.M.N.Rajaraman — Income Tax | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 01.11.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶7

TAX CASE APPEAL NO.177 OF 2011

¶8

The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV,

¶9

Chennai. .... Appellant/Respondent

¶10

-vs-

¶11

Mr.M.N.Rajaraman 6, Vidyodaya First Cross St. T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. ...Respondent/Appellant

¶12

Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'B' Bench, dated 23.04.2010 in ITA No.616/Mds/2007, for the Assessment year 1999-00. against the common order dated 23.01.2007 made in ITA.No.75 & 77 to 81/06-07 on the file of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-I, Chennai-34 against the order dated 10.08.2006 made in F.No.CHE/CEN-1(3)/MNR/(SRM) 200607 on the file of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(3) Old No.108, Chennai-34.

¶13

For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mr.Quadir Hoseyn

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

[Judgement of the Court was delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam, J.]

¶16

This appeal by the appellant/Revenue is directed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'B' Bench, dated 23.04.2010 in ITA No.616/Mds/2007, for the Assessment year 1999-00.

¶17

2.Heard Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.Quadir Hoseyn, learned Counsel for the Respondent/assessee.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

3.This Appeal has been admitted on 12.07.2011, on the following Substantial Question of Law:

¶20

"(i)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in quashing the order of the Assessing Officer levying a penalty of Rs. 18,33,458/- u/sec.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act?”

¶21

4.We have perused the order of Assessment as well as the Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax and we find that the tax effect in this appeal is lesser than the threshold limit mentioned in Circular No.3 of 2008, dated 11.07.2018, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which fixes the monetary limit as Rs.50,00,000/- for the Department to pursue the matter. Furthermore, the Revenue has not been able to point out any distinguishing features, by which the Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, cannot be applied.

¶22

5.Thus, for the above reasons, the Revenue cannot pursue this Appeal in view of the low tax effect. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed and the Substantial Question of Law, framed for consideration, is left open. No costs. The Revenue is at liberty to seek for restoration of appeal if at a later point of time, it is found that the tax effect is above the threshold limit or to fall under the exceptional clauses mentioned in the Circular.

¶23

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mrm To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'B' Bench. 2.O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals-I), Chennai-34. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Old No.108, MG Road, Chennai-34. +1cc to Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.76073 +1cc to Mr.Quadir Hoseyn, Advocate, S.R.No.76001

¶24

T.C.A.No.177 of 2011 VGII(Co) CS/11/12/2018

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Commissioiner of Income Tax IV v. Mr.M.N.Rajaraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Commissioiner of Income Tax IV v. Mr.M.N.Rajaraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.AA713 Vs the Income Tax Officer

M/S Tractors and Farm Vs the Assistant Commissioner

M/S.Calibre Financial Vs the Income Tax Officer

Commissioner Vs M/s Tansi Watch Assembly Unit

The Kodumudi Growers Vs the Income Tax Officer

Commissioner of Income Tax, Vs Shri S.Selvaraj