The High Court of Madras dismissed a review application filed by Kavitha against a second appeal decree. The court recorded that the petitioner appeared absent and the counsel showed lack of interest in prosecuting the matter, deeming no further indulgence necessary.
Review Application dismissed and connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:14.06.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
Review Application No.33 of 2017
in
S.A.No.225 of 2011
Kavitha ... Review Petitioner/Appellant
Vs.
... Respondent/Respondent
Ramasamy
Prayer:
Review Petition filed under Order 47, Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 29.11.2016 and passed in S.A.No.225 of 2011.
PRAYER IN SA.225/2011 : Second Appeal is filed Under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.09.2010 made in AS No.25/2008 an the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore confirming the Judgment and decree dated 21.01.2008 made in OS No.72 of 2004 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.
For Review Petitioner : No appearance
No representation for the Review Petitioner. Review Petitioner called absent.
2.It is found that this Review Application has been adjourned now and then, at the request of the petitioner's counsel and despite the same, petitioner's counsel is not interested in prosecuting the matter. No further indulgence is required to be shown.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-iv)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mfa
To
+1cc to Mr.R.GURURAJ, Advocate, S.R.No.38361
Review Application No.33 of 2017 in S.A.No.225 of 2011
VG II(CO) TR(28/06/2018)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Kavitha
Ramasamy
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
