Second Appeal filed by Mohammed Yousuf under Section 100 CPC. No appearance on behalf of the appellant. Appeal dismissed for default; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
Second Appeal dismissed for default; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 20.11.2018
Coram:
The Honourable Mr. Justice R. PONGIAPPAN
Second Appeal No.973 of 2007
Mr. Mohammed Yousuf Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
Versus
Mrs. Mumtaj Begum Respondent/Respondent/Defendant
PRAYER: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil
Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.08.2006
passed by the Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram in A.S.No. 40 of
2004 confirming the Judgment and Decree passed by the District
Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Chidambaram in O.S.No.48 of
2001 dated 30.03.2004.
For Apellant : No appearance
For Respondent : Ms.R.Gayathri for Mr.R. Sunilkumar
ORDER
This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.08.2006 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram in A.S.No. 40 of 2004 confirming the Judgment and Decree passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Chidambaram in O.S.No.48 of 2001 dated 30.03.2004.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vrn
To
1. The Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram.
2. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,
Chidambaram.
3. The Section Officer, VR Section,
High Court, Madras – 104.
Second Appeal No.973 of 2007
CP(CO)
GMY(24/12/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammed Yousuf
Mumtaj Begum
R. PONGIAPPAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
