In a second appeal filed under the Civil Procedure Code, the appellant sought and was granted permission to withdraw. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn without costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the second appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
S.A.No.867 of 1999
S.A.Natarajan ... Appellant(3 rd defendant)
Vs.
1.Tmt.S.Manickammal ... 1 st Respondent(plaintiff)
2.Tmt.Rukmaniammal ... 2 nd Respondent(2 nd Defendant)
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against
the judgment and decree dated 09.01.1997 in A.S.No.22 of 1996 on
the file of Principal District Judge's Court, Coimbatore
preferred against the judgment and decree dated 07.11.1995 in
O.S.No.2139 of 1982 on the file of II Additional District
Munsif's Court, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr.C.R.Prasanan
For Respondents : No Appearance
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks the
permission of this Court to withdraw this second appeal and has
also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.
2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel
appearing for the appellant, this second appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pri
To
Copy to: The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.(2 copies)
+1cc to Mr.C.R.PRASANAN, Advocate, S.R.No. 8198
S.A.No.867 of 1999
SV(CO)
TR(20/02/2018)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant permission to withdraw the second appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.A. Natarajan
Tmt. S. Manickammal
Tmt. Rukmaniammal
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
