The second appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after the appellant filed a memo recording a compromise between the parties to the dispute.
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.01.2018 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A. No.769 of 2003
Ganesan ... Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Venkatesan 2.Srinivasan [Second respondent impleaded as party respondent vide order of the Court dated 10.01.2007 made in C.M.P.No.15814 of 2005] ... Respondents/Defandants Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 08.12.1998 made in A.S.No.346 of 1997 on the file of Principal District Judge, Nagapattinam, confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.02.1997 made in O.S.No.14 of 1995 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai.
For Appellant :M/s.C.Uma Shankar
For RR1 :Mr.A.Muthukumar
R2 :No appearance
J U D G M E N T
Both counsel present. Memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, seeking permission to withdraw the second appeal, in view of the compromise entered into between the parties. The above said memo is recorded.
2.In the light of the above position, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed. Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
mfa
To
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court Madras.(2 copies) +1cc to Mr.A.Muthukumar, Advocate, S.R.No.245
S.A. No.769 of 2003
KJI(CO) RRK(22/01/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganesan
Venkatesan
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
