6.As rightly put forth by the defendants' counsel, when the trial court has given weighty reasons for rejecting the plaintiff's case and when the first appellate court has failed to advert to the same, particularly, without in any manner considering on the materials placed on record, more particularly without deliberating on the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the defendants, it is found that the first appellate court being the final court of facts, has committed a serious error in reversing the judgment and decree of the trial court by ignoring or failing to take into consideration the materials placed by the defendants to resist the plaintiffs' case. It is found that,when the first appellate court is expected to give reasons either for confirming or reversing, more particularly for reversing the findings of facts of the trial court as per section 96, r/w Order 41 Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is found that as far as this case is concerned, the first appellate court proceeded to reverse the judgment and decree of the trial court without any discussions and no reason is spelt out in its judgment for disagreeing with the findings of the trial court, on any one of the aspects of the matter and in such view of the matter, it is found that the judgment and decree of the first appellate court are found to be not in consonance with the principles of law as adumbrated in the decisions reported in 2018 (1) SCC 604 [C.Venkata Swamy Vs. H.N.Shivanua (Dead) by Lrs and another], AIR 1986 Supreme Court 2823 [ Smt.Sawarni Vs. Smt.Inder Kaur and others] and 2011 (2) CTC 642 [C.G.Jayaraman and the South Indian Bank Ltd., rep.by its Branch Manager, Mahe. Vs. C.Gangadharan].
