Sk Murthy v. N Subbulakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the Second Appeal as not pressed after the appellant's counsel filed a memo stating the appeal was not being pressed, without recording reasons.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 26.11.2018
Coram:
The Honourable Mr. Justice R. PONGIAPPAN
Second Appeal No.308 of 2007
S.K. Murthy Defendant/Respondent/Appellant
Versus
1. N. Subbulakshmi
2. Nagarajan
3. Muneeswaran
4. Maheswari
5. Velmurugan Plaintiffs/Appellants/Respondents
PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and decree of Additional Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai dated 12.12.2005 made in A.S.No.20 of 2005 reversing the Judgment and decree of Additional District Munsif Court, Mayiladuthurai dated 06.12.2004 made in O.S.No.808 of 1996.
For Appellant : Ms. Lavanya for Mr. S. Sounthar For Respondents : No appearance
ORDER
The Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and decree of Additional Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai dated 12.12.2005 made in A.S.No.20 of 2005 reversing the Judgment and decree of Additional District Munsif Court, Mayiladuthurai dated 06.12.2004 made in O.S.No.808 of 1996.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.K. Murthy
- respondent
N. Subbulakshmi
- respondent
Nagarajan
- respondent
Muneeswaran
- respondent
Maheswari
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court