The High Court of Madras ordered the second appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel seeking permission to withdraw. No costs were awarded and connected miscellaneous petition, if any, was closed.
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:27.06.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.2275 of 2004
V.Venkateswara Rao ...Appellant/Respondent/ Plaintiff Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, represented by its Member Secretary, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ..Respondent/Appellant/ Defendant Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 09.07.2003 made in A.S.No.297 of 2002 on the file of the VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai reversing the judgment and decree dated 09.08.2000 in O.S.No.9033 of 1994 on the file of the XV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras. For Appellant : Mr.D.S.Rajasekaran For Respondent : No appearance. J U D G M E N T
Counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the Second Appeal and also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In the light of the above position, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.
mfa Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai.(2 copies) MR(CO) sm:10.7.2018 S.A.No.2275 of 2004
V. Venkateswara Rao
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
