P.Rajamanickam v. Navaneetham
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed the second appeal with no costs as it had abated due to the death of the sole appellant without his legal heirs impleading themselves.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as abated; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
S.A.No.2003 of 2002
P.Rajamanickam ... Appellant
Vs.
1.Navaneetham
2.Arthanari
3.Subramani
4.Natesan
5.Parameswaran
6.Ramesh ...Respondents
PRAYER: The Second Appeal has been filed under Section
100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.08.1999
in A.S.No.8/99 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Salem,
confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 25.09.1998 made in
O.s.No.637/91 on the file of the Principal District Munsif
Court, Salem.
For Appellant :Mr.K.Selvaraj
For Respondents :No appearance for R1,2, &4 to 6 R3 - Died
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant has died. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. However, the legal heirs of the appellant have not come forward to implead themselves in the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P. Rajamanickam
- respondent
Navaneetham
- respondent
Arthanari
- respondent
Subramani
- respondent
Natesan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court