Krishnan v. Venugopal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal fileddbysubordinatedefaultbecausecounselappearedandrequestedadjournmenteventhoughtapostedfinalhearingcourtdismissedtncasewithouthearinganddeclaredconnectedmisCELLANEOUSPETITIONCLOSEDT.1.12.2018.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as default; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 15.11.2018
Coram:
The Honourable Mr. Justice R. PONGIAPPAN
Second Appeal No. 196 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 Krishnan : Appellant / Plaintiff Versus 1. Venugopal 2. Selvi : Respondents/Defendants PRAYER: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 31.01.2006 passed in A.S.No. 20 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram confirming the order dated 17.11.2004 passed in O.S.No.293 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
Today, when the appeal is taken up for consideration, there is no representation on either side. On 09.11.2018, when the appeal is listed for consideration, the Counsel appearing for the appellant, present and asked for adjournment. Therefore, the appeal is listed under the caption of “Final Hearing”.
- Today, when the case is taken up for consideration, there is no representation on either side, even after posting the matter under the caption of “Final Hearing”.
- In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as default. No costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Krishnan
- respondent
Venugopal
- respondent
Selvi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court