G.Kuppusamy v. G.Kalivamurthy
Case brief
What is this about?
In the absence of the deceased sole appellant's legal heirs and counsel, this Second Appeal was dismissed as abetted.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as abetted. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:10.12.2018
Coram:
The Hon'ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
S.A.No.1902 of 2004
G.Kuppusamy .. Appellant / Appellant /
Plaintiff
/versus/
1.G.Kaliyamurthy
2.T.Munusamy @ Kathambam .. Respondents / Respondents /
Respondents
Prayer: This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of
the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree
passed in A.S.No.34 of 2002 dated 27.02.2004 on the file of the
Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai confirming the
judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.985 of 1995 dated
27.03.2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif,
Mayiladuthurai.
For Appellant :No appearance
For Respondents :Mr.S.Sounthar for R2
No appearance for R1
----------
JUDGMENT
On 06.06.2018, it was reported before this Court that the sole appellant died and the learned counsel for the appellant sought time to take appropriate steps. Despite more than 6 months have lapsed, no application is filed to bring the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant.
- Today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is not present.
- In the light of the above fact, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abetted. No order as to costs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Kuppusamy
- respondent
G.Kaliyamurthy
- respondent
T.Munusamy @ Kathambam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court