Kuppammal v. Loganathan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed by Kuppammal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant remained absent on the date of hearing without any representation.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1754 of 2004
Kuppammal .. Appellant/2 nd Plaintiff
Vs.
1. Loganathan
2. Ravi
3. Kannammal
4. Indrani
5. Usha
6. Babu .. Respondents/Defendant
Prayer :- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC
against the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2002 made in
A.S.No.17 of 1999 on the file of the Subordinate Judge,
Thirupattur, Vellore District against the judgment and decree
dated 27.03.1999 made in O.S.No.305 of 1996 on the file of
Principal District Munsif, Ambur.
For the appellant : No appearance
For the respondents : Mr.V.K.Elango
JUDGMENT
Counsel for the respondents present. No representation for
the appellant.
2. This matter was listed yesterday and there was no
representation for the appellant and the appellant being called
and remaining absent, Registry was directed to list the matter
on 20.04.2018 under the caption "for dismissal".
3. Today also, when the matter is called, there is no
representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent.
4. Resultantly, Second Appeal is dismissed for non
prosecution with costs.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kuppammal
- respondent
Loganathan
- respondent
Ravi
- respondent
Kannammal
- respondent
Indrani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court