Single-judge court dismissed a second appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. due to the appellant's non-appearance and lack of representation.
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with costs of Rs. 10/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.01.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1501 of 2003
O.T.Muthaiah Pillai
Anbanathapuram Vahaiyara Charities Thiruindalur,
rep. by its Manager, Subramanian, .. Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff
Prayer : - Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2003 made in A.S.No.80 of 2002 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai confirming the judgment and decree dated 01.07.2002 made in O.S.No.779 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Mayiladuthurai.
Appellant - No appearance For the Respondent : Mr.S.Sounthar JUDGMENT
This matter was listed on 17.01.2018 and on that day, the counsel for the appellant represented that he has already given change of vakalat to the party and also made an endorsement to that effect and the appellant being called and remained absent, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption " for dismissal" by printing the name of the appellant in the cause list.
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
Stamp for Vakalatnama ...10.00
--------
To be paid by the Appellant
to the Respondent 10.00
--------
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
adl
To
1. The Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai.
2. The Principal District Munsif Court, Mayiladuthurai.
S.A.No.1501 of 2003
gj(co)
aa22/02/2018
O.T.Muthaiah Pillai
Anbanathapuram Vahaiyara Charities Thiruindalur
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
