The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed because the appellants failed to appear and their counsel withdrew without formal endorsement, leading the court to dismiss the matter for non-prosecution.
The Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with costs of Rs. 10/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1281 of 2004
For the Appellants : No appearance
For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.N.Manoharan
JUDGMENT
Counsel for the respondents present.
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS SA.1281 OF 2004 Appellants/Petitioners( ) Costs Rs. p Stamp for Vakalatnama 10.00 Advocate's fee [certificate not received] FC Not Filed Translation and Printing/Typing charges NIL To be paid by the Petitioner() to the Respondent() -----------10.00 -------------Rupees Ten only to be paid to the respondent by the petitioner as cost incurred in this appeal. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar adl To 1. The Sub Court, Bhavani. 2. The I Additional District Minsif, Bhavani. Copy TO The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.( 2 Copies) +1cc to Mr.Zeenath Begum, Advocate SR.No.28548 +1cc to Mr.N.Manokaran, Advocate SR.No.28966
S.A.No.1281 of 2004
CP(CO) GN(31/05/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.C. Marappa Gounder
K.M. Venkidusamy
K.M. Rathinasamy
Chandramouli @ Senthil Kumar
Jayakumari
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
