The Second Appeal was closed on the appellant's own representation that the parties had settled the issues out of court. No order as to costs was passed.
Second Appeal closed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 22-11-2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Second Appeal No.1280 of 2005
Nawab Masjith Trust, Tindivanam, a Mohammedan Religious Trust, represented by its Manager .. Appellant ..Vs.. R.Narayanan .. Respondent Second Appeal is preferred under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.61 of 2004 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tindivanam dated 30.3.2005, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.159 of 1999 dated 23.2.2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tindivanam.
For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For Respondent : Mr.S.Kaithamalaikumaran J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant made a submission that during the pendency of the Second Appeal, the parties to the lis on hand have settled the issues out of Court. However, the learned counsel for the respondent states that he has no instructions in this regard. In view of the fact that the appellant themselves states that the matter has already been settled, no purpose would be served by keeping the Second Appeal pending any further. Accordingly, the Second Appeal Stands closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/-/Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Svn
To
2.Additional District Munsif Court, Tindivanam.
Copy to The section officer, VR Section, High court Madras
S.A.No.1280 of 2005 ASK(20/12/2018)
Nawab Masjith Trust, Tindivanam
R.Narayanan
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
