The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a second appeal filed in 1996 for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear and raise a representation on the date of hearing.
The second appeal was dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
S.A.No.1273 of 1996
Vasanthammal ...Appellant
..Vs..
1.S.Sivaprakasa Gramani (deceased) 2.K.Dilli Ammal 3.C.B.Chitti Babu 4.N.Venkateswarlu 5.S.Parvathy Ammal 6.Chellaiah 7.S.Kana Kavathi 8.Indira Bai 9.Saraswathi 10.Ganapathy 11.Mahadevan 12.Shribagavalli (RR7 to R12 are brought on record on legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent vide order of Court dated 26.1.2006 made in C.M.P.No.6056 to 6060 of 2006) ...Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the common judgment and decree dated 06.01.1995 in A.S.No.178 of 1993 on the file of the Fifth Additional City Civil Judge, Madras, reversing the judgment and decree dated 18.03.1992 in O.S.No.5429 of 1998 on the file of XIV Assistant City Civil Judge, Madras. For Appellant : Mr.B.Harikrishnan No appearance For R1 : No appearance For R2 to R6 : Dismissed vide Court order dated 15.2.06 For R11 : Notice served – No appearance IInd Batta with petition due Reg.R7 to R10&R12
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the common judgment and decree dated 06.01.1995 in A.S.No.178 of 1993 on the file of the Fifth Additional City Civil Judge, Madras, reversing the judgment and decree dated 18.03.1992 in O.S.No.5429 of 1998 on the file of XIV Assistant City Civil Judge, Madras.
J U D G M E N T
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 14.02.2018, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on 22.02.2018. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nvi
To
1.The V Additional City Civil Judge, Madras
2.The XIV Assistant City Civil Judge, Madras
Copy To
3.The Record Keeper
VR Section,
High Court,Madras-104
S.A.No.1273 of 1996
AD(CO)
BM 29/06/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vasanthammal
S.Sivaprakasa Gramani (deceased) and Others
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
