C.K.Ramasamy v. C.K.Rangasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals in civil matters dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants failed to appear on listing dates despite summons.
What did the court decide?
Both second appeals dismissed for non-prosecution with costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.Nos.1000 & 1001 of 2003
S.A.No.1000 of 2003
1.C.K.Ramasamy
2.R.Kandavel
3.R.Soundararajan ... Appellants/Appellants/Defendants
Vs.
C.K.Rangasamy ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
S.A.No.1001 of 2003
1.R.Kandavel
2.R.Soundararajan ... Appellants/Appellants/Plaintiffs
Vs.
1.C.K.Rangasamy
2.Saraswathi ... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
Common Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 22.01.2003 passed in A.S.Nos.58 and 89 of 2001 on the file of the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, confirming the decree and judgment dated 10.04.2001 passed in O.S.No.1183 of 1995 and O.S.No.1439 of 1996 on the file of the Second Additional District Munsif of Coimbatore, respectively.
For Appellants :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the respondents present in both the second appeals.
These second appeals were listed on 11.01.2018 and on that date, there was no representation for the appellants in both the matters and accordingly, the appellants being called and remaining absent, Registry was directed to list these matters, today (i.e) on 12.01.2018, under the caption “for dismissal”.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.K.Ramasamy
- petitioner
R.Kandavel
- petitioner
R.Soundararajan
- respondent
C.K.Rangasamy
- respondent
Saraswathi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court