Judgment allowing no ground for review of the order of 17.02.2017, which restored the status quo ante pursuant to the decree and confirmed judgment in the Second Appeal. Review applied under CPC Order 47 rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Rev.Appln. Nos.77 to 79 of 2017
and S.A.Nos.549, 1004 & 1005 of 2006
P.Chellamuthu ... Applicant in Rev.A.No.77/2017
M.Muthusamy ... Applicant in Rev.A.No.78/2017
A.V.Rajendran ... Applicant in Rev.A.No.79/2017
Vs.
1 Abinaya Muthusamy
2 N.Annapoorani
3 S.Natesan
4 M.Narayanasami
5 Ramaiah ... Respondents in all Rev.Applns
Prayer in all Rev.Applns: Review Application filed under Order47 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C. praying to review the judgment and decree of this Court made in S.A.Nos.549, 1004 & 1005 of 2006
For Applicant in all Rev.Applns. : Mr. R.G.Narendiran For R1 in all Rev.Applns. : Mr. G.T.Subramanian
COMMON ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners and the
learned counsel for the respondents who has taken notice and made a submission opposing the review petition.
2 The sum and substance of the review petition and pursuant to
the judgment of this Court confirming the judgment of the Courts below
and this Court finds that there is no ground to review the order passed
2
G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
rpl
by this Court on 17.02.2017.
3 It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellants, who
are the review petitioners herein that, subsequent to the judgment of this Court, some of the parties/respondents are alienating the suit property
which actually by virtue of this Court order vest with the State.
4 It is needless to look into events, which had happened
pendent lite or subsequent to the passing of the decree. It is suffice to make it clear that by virtue of the decree passed by the Trial court and the same being confirmed in Second Appeal by this Court, the Status Quo Ante as on day prior to passing of re conveyance order, which is marked as Ex.A3 dated 14.02.1995 is restored. With these observation, the Review Petition is disposed of.
07.06.2018
Internet : Yes rpl
To
Rev.Appln. Nos.77 to 79 of 2017 and S.A.Nos.549, 1004 & 1005 of 2006
1 issue framed by the court
Whether ground exists to allow review of the order passed by the Court on 17.02.2017.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Chellamuthu
M.Muthusamy
A.V.Rajendran
Abinaya Muthusamy
N.Annapoorani
S.Natesan
G.Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
