R.Paneerselvam v. Mrs. Manimegalai
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the Original Side Appeal as the appellant had withdrawn it, not pressed the matter, and filed an endorsement to that effect.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
O.S.A.No.314 of 2017
R.Paneerselvam ...Appellant
Vs.
1.Manimegalai
2.P.Malliga ...Respondents
Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of
O.S.Rules to set aside the order and decree dated 11.08.2016 in
Application No.7584 of 2015 in T.O.S.No.57 of 2013.
For Appellant : Mr.P.B.Balaji
For Respondents: Mr.C.Samadhaarasu for R1
Mr.V.Raghavachari for R2
J U D G M E N T
(Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH,J.)
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that settlement
was arrived at between the parties and the joint memo of
compromise was also filed in the connected C.S.No.396 of 2012
and in view of the settlement and compromise memo filed, he is
not pressing this Appeal. He has also made an endorsement to
that effect.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the
learned counsel for the appellant, this Original Side Appeal is
dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-V)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Paneerselvam
- respondent
Manimegalai
- respondent
P. Malliga
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court