Disposed

Hemant Dugar v. Brij Khandelwal

Madras HC30 Oct 2018OP/725/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, in an original civil petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between partners of NHD Homes regarding the management position and related issues.

What did the court decide?

The original petition was allowed; N.P. Paul Vasanthakumar was appointed as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.

Hemant Dugar Vs Brij Khandelwal — Arbitration | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

O.P. No.725 of 2018
In the matter of Section 11(6) of
the Arbitration and Conciliation
Act, 1996
and
In the matter of the Partnership
Agreement dated 19.11.2010
and
In the matter of Arbitration
Clause No.13 of the Partnership
Agreement dated 19.11.2010.
Hemant Dugar,
No.61, Poes Garden,
Chennai-600 086. ... Petitioner
-Versus-

¶7

Brij Khandelwal, No.23, Electro House, Ramanathan Street, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.

¶8

Anish C. Badani, No.18, Old No.10, Mahaveer Colony, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

¶11

Arun Thangam, No.42, Subhaih Pillai Layout, CA Koil Road, Karur-639 001.

¶12

Raunaq Rungta, Rungta House, No.65-A, Halls Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 5. Nilesh D. Modi, Flat No.5, 28/1, Rajarathinam Street, Kilpauk, Opp. to Hotel Beverly, Chennai-600 010. 6. Nalini Bafna, No.5, Branson Garden Street, 2nd Floor, Kellys, Chennai-600 010.

¶13

Pramita Rathi, No.4, Ramanan Road, Chennai-600 079.

¶14

Anil Kumar Daga, 122 Broadway, 1st Floor, Opp. Union Bank of India, Chennai-600 108.

¶15

Mrs.Pooja Dugar, No.61, Poes Garden, Chennai-600 086. ... Respondents Original petition praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to appoint an Arbitrator/Arbitrators to adjudicate upon the disputes between the petitioner and the respondents arising out of the partnership agreement dated 19.11.2010.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

¶18

This Original Petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing, the Court made the following order:

¶19

The application has been filed for appointment of

¶20

Arbitrator/Arbitrators to adjudicate upon the disputes between the petitioner and the respondents who are partners of NHD Homes. The Partnership Deed dated 19.11.2010 of NHD Homes contain an arbitration clause.

¶21

The dispute between the petitioner and the respondents

¶22

is as to who is the Managing Partner of the firm NHD Homes. There are collateral proceedings, which are pending in separate applications and original petitions with which, we are not concerned for the present.

¶23

With the consent of the counsel Hon'ble Mr.Justice

¶24

N.Paul Vasanthakumar, retired Chief Justice, Jammu & Kashmir, residing at “ASHIRVADH”, No.24-A, II Street, Kamaraj Avenue, Adayar, Chennai – 600 020 (Ph: 044-24452817, 24454381) is

¶25

appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties.

¶26

The learned Arbitrator may, after issuing notice to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

the parties and upon hearing them, pass an award as

¶28

¶29

expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. All the issues touching upon the rights and liabilities of the partners are decided by the learned Arbitrator.

¶30

MOU signed by Mr.Hemant Dugar for NHD Homes with M/s.Amar Prakaash Developers Pvt.Ltd., learned Arbitrator may consider allowing M/s. Amar Prakaash Developers Pvt.Ltd.,represented by its Authorized Signatory to be impleaded in the proceeding at the appropriate stage to resolve the dispute between the feuding partners and the grievance of the builder viz., M/s.Amar Prakaash Pvt.Ltd.,

¶31

remuneration and other incidental expenses.

¶32

the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and in accordance

¶33

with the Madras High Court Arbitration Rules.

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

¶36

The Original Petition is, accordingly, allowed,

¶37

leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

¶38

Sd/-C.S.N.J
30/10/2018
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
JJ 11/11/2019
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Hemant Dugar v. Brij Khandelwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant Dugar v. Brij Khandelwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ondraga Digital Pvt.Ltd Vs Sun Power Solar Technick Pvt. Ltd.

M/S.Dugar Housing Developments Vs Settlement Commission (It & Wt

Mrs. Amirtham Vs the Land Commissioner

M.P.Sudha, Vs Green Tree Homes and Ventures Pvt. Ltd.

Mr.Gopalan Kumar Iyer Vs Mr.a.Sudhir Kumar Surana

M/s.Y.Chinna Reddy Vs The Union of India