Dismissed

A.Parimala v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC12 Sept 2018HCP(MD)/722/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition filed by A.Parimala seeking her minor daughter's release from police custody. The minor appeared before the court, stated willingness to return with her mother, and the court closed the petition and connected miscellaneous petitions accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Habeas Corpus petition and connected miscellaneous petitions are closed upon the production and willingness of the minor to return with the petitioner.

A.Parimala Vs the Commissioner of Police — Child Custody and Guardianship | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 12.09.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

H.C.P.[MD].No.722 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.7171 and 7172 of 2018

¶7

A.Parimala : Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, [Law and Order], C5 Karimedu Police Station, Madurai.

¶10

P.Vigneshwaran 4. Pandian 5. Devi 6. Vinoth 7. Bala : Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent No.2 to secure the petitioner's daughter, namely, S.Swathi, aged about 16 years and 11 months from the illegal and unlawful custody of the respondents 3 to 7 on the basis of the representation made by the petitioner to the second respondent by person on 16.05.2018 and also by post to the first respondent and produce her on today before this Court and hand over custody to the petitioner.

¶12

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu Additional Public Prosecutor https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Respondents 4 to 7 : Mr.M.Solaisamy

O R D E R

***************

[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.]

¶17

The detenu is produced before this Court. She states that she is willing to go with her mother, the petitioner herein.

¶18

Recording the said submission, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.

¶19

	Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Wri	ts)
To	/True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar	(CS-II)
1.	The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.
2.	The Inspector of Police, [Law and Order], C5 Karimedu Police Station, Madurai.
3.	The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+ 1 + 1	CC TO Mr.R.KRISHNAMOORTHY, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 84851 CC TO Mr.M.SOLAISAMY, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 83786
NB TE/	SKN/SAR-2 : 01/10/2018 : 2P/6C
	ORDER H.C.P.[MD].No.722 12	MADE IN of 2018 .09.2018

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Parimala v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Parimala v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uthiraselvam, Vs the Inspector of Police

State of Tamil Nadu, Vs K.Lakshmi

Seevan Selvaraj Vs the District Collector

M.a.Nagoor Meera, Vs the Election Officer

Sivagangai District, Vs the District Collector

T.L.Thulasiraman, Vs Tamil Nadu State Co-Op.