Dismissed

Jesuraj, v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC10 Oct 2018HCP(MD)/564/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed two Habeas Corpus petitions filed regarding the whereabouts of a woman and a man allegedly involved in elopement. Finding no evidence of illegal detention as the cases involved elopement, the court conceded the petitions and directed authorities to proceed with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Habeas Corpus Petitions closed; officials directed to proceed with investigation.

Jesuraj, Vs the Superintendent of Police — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.10.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

H.C.P.(MD) Nos.564 and 607 of 2018

¶7

HCP(MD)No.564 of 2018:

¶8

Jesuraj ... Petitioner

¶9

vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Ammanayanaickanur Police Station, Ammanayanaickanur Dindigul District. 3. Dass @ Arockiyadhas 4. Sebasthiyan 5. Aruldhas 6. Paulraj ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Alphonsa Mary D/o.Jesuraj aged about 22 years before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthick Subramanian For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu Additional Public Prosecutor HCP(MD)No.607 of 2018:

¶10

A.Kannammal

¶11

... Petitioner

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

¶14

vs.

¶15

The State rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kannivadi Police Station, Dindigul District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Ammayanaickanur Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶16

Jesuraj ... Respondents

¶17

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's husband by name Arockiadoss S/o.Selvaraj male aged 34 years before this Court and consequently set him at liberty.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Mohamed Igshaj For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu Additional Public Prosecutor

¶19

COMMON ORDER

¶20

[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.]

¶21

As it is the case of elopement for second time, we do not find any illegal detention involved.

¶22

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that investigation is pending.

¶23

3.In view of the above submission, we direct the official respondents to proceed with the investigation. These Habeas Corpus Petitions are closed accordingly.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar (Writs)

¶26

/True Copy/

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-)

¶29

¶30

¶31

1.	The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.	The Inspector of Police, Kannivadi Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.	The Inspector of Police, Ammayanaickanur Police Station, Dindigul District.
4.	The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
MJ
TE/	SV/SAR-1 : 31/10/2018 : 3P/5C
	H.C.P.(MD) Nos.564 and 607 of 2018 10.10.2018

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Jesuraj, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jesuraj, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thulasi Vs the Principal Secretary to

P.G.Paulraj Vs State Represented through

V.R.Karthikeyan Vs the District Collector

Selvaraj, Vs the Thasildar

Mariammal Vs the Principal Secretary to

S.Murugesan, Vs the Registrar of Co-Operative