An Habeas Corpus petition filed for the release of the petitioner's wife was dismissed for default as no appearance was made by the petitioner on the hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI
H.C.P.(MD)No.273 of 2018
P.Saravanan
: Petitioner
Vs
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's wife detenu namely Jesima, D/o.Suberali, aged about 22 years before this Court and set at her liberty.
For Petitioner : No appearance For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu Additional Public Prosecutor *****
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by S.VIMALA, J.]
When the matter came up for hearing on 19.03.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Hebeas Corpus Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(W)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
Ls/rj2
AE/KKR/SAR3/10.04.2018/2P/4C
H.C.P.(MD)No.273 of 2018 26.03.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Saravanan
The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District
The Inspector of Police, Thuvarankurichi Police Station, Trichy District
Suberali
S.Vimala
T.Krishnavalli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
