Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking habeas corpus for a detenue. The petitioner indicated they would not press the petition after the medical board recommended admission for a relative which was refused. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.01.2018
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER & THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
H.C.P.No.2026 of 2017
S.Esaivani ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu
Represented by its Secretary,
Home Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai-600 009.
2. The Superintendent of Central Prison,
Central Jail, Puzhal,
Chennai- 600 066. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the first respondent to grant two months ordinary leave to the detenue M.Senthil @ Senthilkumar, son of Nagappan, lifer C.No.189, now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu
For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran, Addl. Public Prosecutor.
2.The Medical Board had recommended Ms.S.Nila, admission, which she refused.
3.Given these circumstances, the counsel for the petitioner, says that he has instructions not to press the petition.
05.01.2018
S.Esaivani
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Superintendent of Central Prison, Central Jail, Puzhal, Chennai
RAJIV SHAKDHER
N. SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
