M/S.E.Prema v. Mr.G.Selvamoorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
In the absence of the petitioner/applicant, the High Court dismissed both the suit for partition and the associated application for non-prosecution under Order VII Rule 1 CPC.
What did the court decide?
The suit and application were dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.11.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
C.S. No. 878 of 2008
& O.A.No.994 of 2008
Mrs.E.Prema
.....Plaintiff
Vs
1. Mr.G.Selvamoorthy
2. Mr.G.Ashok Kumar
3. Mrs.Thamizharasi
4. Mr.Anbumani
5. Mr.Goutham
6. Mrs.Manoranjitham
7. Mr.Anbalagan
8. Mrs.Arumaikannu
9. Mr.A.Pukharaj Jain
10.Mr.B.Gajaraj ..... Defendants
Prayer: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of High Court Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC for a decree and judgment for partition and separate possession of her 1/5th share in the property land and building in Door No.81, Old No.39, Avadana Pappier Road, Chennai – 600 112 and morefully described in the schedule to the plaint; for future mesne profits from the date of plaint till the date of realization which is valued tentatively at Rs.1,000/- per annum and for costs.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaint filed for partition and separate possession be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs. E. Prema
- respondent
Mr. G. Selvamoorthy
- respondent
Mr. G. Ashok Kumar
- respondent
Mrs. Thamizharasi
- respondent
Mr. Anbumani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court