M/S.Farmland Food Products v. M/S Kjs Imports and Exports
Case brief
What is this about?
The suit was dismissed as abated because the plaintiff company had been wound up as of March 2016, verified by an online search report submitted by counsel.
The suit was dismissed as abated because the plaintiff company had been wound up as of March 2016, verified by an online search report submitted by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.S.No.70 of 2014 and A.Nos.4479 & 4480 of 2017 M/s.Farmland Food Products LLC, PO Box 111985 Dubai, UAE Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Abdul Malik ... Plaintiff Versus 1.M/s.KJS Imports & Exports Private Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Mr.M.S.Eswaramoorthy H-59, T-7, Neithal Flats, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041. 2.M.S.Eswaramoorthy 3.Suresh ... Defendants
Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code praying to pass a judgment and decree for:
(a) directing the defendants to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.12,03,037/- (Rupees Twelve Lakhs Three Thousand and Thirty Seven Rupees only) together with interest at 12% on Rs.9.78.080/- being the equivalent of USD 16,000 from the date of presentation of plaint till date of realisation;
2
(b) directing the defendants to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) as damages towards loss of business opportunity, loss of reputation and goodwill and
(c) for costs of the suit.
For Plaintiff : Mr.Aasim Shehzad For Defendants : Mr.Edwin Prabhakaran
J U D G M E N T
A memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the defendants
stating that the plaintiff Company has been wound up even during March
defendants.
and reported that the plaintiff Company had been wound up.
connected applications are closed.
05.02.2018
dsa Index : Yes/ No Internet : Yes/ No Speaking Order/ Non-speaking Order
3
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
dsa
C.S.No.70 of 2014
05.02.2018
R.Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court