The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of Civil Suit No. 467 of 2013 based on a joint memorandum of compromise dated 03.10.2018 executed by the parties. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 04.10.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
C.S.No.467 of 2013
Y. Gnanalochani ...Plaintiff
Vs
J. Yoganandan ...Defendants
Prayer: Plaint is filed under Order VII Rule 1 C.P.C r/w Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules to pass a judgment and decree against the defendant.
(i) For partition of the suit property allotting = share to the plaintiff in respect of �B� and �C� scheduled Mentioned property
(ii) For appointment of Advocate commissioner to effect the Partition of the suit property by metes and bounds
(iii) By way of final decree order for a separate possession of = share to the plaintiff in respect of �B� and �C� Schedule Mentioned Property.
(iv) Direct the defendants to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
For Plaintiff : Mr.C. Subramanian
For Defendant : Mr.J.yoganandan ( Party in person)
DR. ANITA SUMANTH, J. mrn
JUDGMENT
A joint memo of compromise dated 03.10.2018 recording the terms of settlement as between the parties for settlement of the suit is placed on file. The joint memo of compromise has been duly executed by the plaintiff and her counsel and the defendant who appears as a party in person. 2. This suit is disposed of in terms of the joint memorandum of compromise dated 03.10.2018, which forms part and parcel of this judgment. No costs.
04.10.2018 mrn
2/2
C.S.No.467 of 2013
Anita Sumanth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
