Dismissed

Janani Subramanyan v. Ramesh Lakshmi Ratan

Madras HC26 Apr 2018CS/169/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras recorded a joint memo of compromise dating from 15.04.2018 filed by the plaintiffs and defendant in a partition suit. The court decreed the suit and passed a final decree in terms of the memo, allotting the property to the defendant and dismissing the prayer for mesne profits.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of joint compromise memo; property alloted to defendant; prayer for mesne profit given up.

Janani Subramanyan Vs Ramesh Lakshmi Ratan — Partition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.04.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

C.S.No.169 of 2011
1.Janani Subramanyan
2.Manoj Subramaniam .. Plaintiffs
Versus
Ramesh Lakshmi Ratan .. Defendant
PRAYER: This Civil Suit filed under IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules R/w
order VII Rule 1 of the Code of the Civil Procedure, prays to pass a judgment
and decree in favour of the plaintiff and as against the defendants:

¶7

Partition and Separate Possession of the plaintiffs' half share in the suit property.

¶8

For Plaintiffs : Mr.T.S.Baskaran
For defendant : Mr.P.B.Ramanujam
JUDGMENT

¶9

The suit has been filed for Partition and separate possession of the

¶10

plaintiffs' half share in the suit property.

¶11

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶12

¶13

2.Earlier, the suit was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre,

¶14

and in the Mediation the parties have settled the dispute between themselves. Now, they have filed a joint memo of compromise dated 15.04.2018 before this Court, signed by the plaintiff and the defendant and counter-signed by their respective counsels. By the above settlement, both the plaintiffs have given the entire suit properties in favour of the defendant.

¶15

2.The terms of memorandum of compromise is hereby recorded and the terms thereof are extracted below:

¶16

“In view of the compromise arrived in O.S.A. No.227 of 2013 and fulfillment of the terms thereof, the suit property bearing Door No.5, Kasturi Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai -18, of an extent of 3 grounds and 884 sq.ft bering Plot No.1, comprised in R.S. No.1576/7 (Old R.S. No.1576/1 part, O.S. No.2757, c.c. No.3963, Block No.32 of Mylapore Division, Mylapore Triplicane Taluk. Chennai District known as 'Gayatri' situate within the Sub-Registration District of Mylapore and Registration District of Chennai Central, hereby stands alloted absolutely to the Defendant.

¶17

ii) The prayer for mesne profit is given up by the plaintiffs.

¶18

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶19

¶20

iii) A final decree may be passed in terms of this Joint Memo of Compromise, the costs, if any, of which shall be borne by the Defendant”

¶21

In view of the above, the suit is decreed in terms of memo of

¶22

compromise dated 15.04.2018, and a final decree is also passed as per the joint compromise memo. The compromise memo shall form part and parcel

¶23

of this order.
26.04.2018
rkp
Index : Yes/ No
Internet : Yes/ No

¶24

Speaking Order/ Non-speaking Order

¶25

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶26

¶27

V.BHARATHIDASAN .J,

rkp

C.S.No.169 of 2011

26.04.2018

http://www.judis.nic.in

Janani Subramanyan v. Ramesh Lakshmi Ratan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janani Subramanyan v. Ramesh Lakshmi Ratan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.v.Thomas Industrial Products Vs Avigna Oil Mills Ltd.& Another

M/S.Kumaran Advertising Vs Government of Tamilnadu

Praveen Kumar B.Jain Vs P.K.Dilli Babu

J.Gopalakrishnan Vs P.N.Manoharan and 5 Others

The Official Assignee Vs b.seethalakshmi

Dr.B.Seethalakshmi Vs the Official Assignee