Sasikumar v. Nallammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras in a civil revision petition under Article 226 dismissed the matter for non-prosecution, citing the petitioner's absence and lack of steps to bring legal heirs on record.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.R.P. (PD) No.625 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.6034 of 2006
Sasikumar ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Nallammal
2.P.Kaliappan
3.Saraswathi
4.Mahalingam
5.M.Satheeshkumar
6.Sivalakshmi
7.Logamatha
8.Shanmughavalli
9.Punitha ... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to allow the Civil Revision Petition and set aside the order of the Principal District Munsif's Court, Namakkal in I.A.No.1955 of 2005 in O.S.No.265 of 2004 dated 12.12.2005.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For R2 : Mr.T.Dhanya Kumar For R3 : Ex parte For RR 5 to 9 : No Appearance
ORDER
There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also not taken any steps to bring the legal heirs on record for the deceased R1.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sasikumar
- respondent
Nallammal
- respondent
P.Kaliappan
- respondent
Saraswathi
- respondent
Mahalingam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court