Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed to set aside an order allowing an injunction petition was dismissed as infructuous because the final decree in the underlying suit had already been passed and execution proceedings were pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.07.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.R.P(PD).No.1690 of 2003
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records in I.A.No.234 of 2003 in O.S.No.176 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti, set aside the order dated 29.04.2003 allow the revision petition.
For Petitioner : Ms.Usha Raman
For Respondent : Mr.R.Gururaj
ORDER
When the matter was called, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the final decree has been passed in the above suit and the execution proceedings are pending. Therefore, nothing survives in the above Civil Revision Petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dh
To
The Sub Court,
Panruti.
C.R.P(PD).No.1690 of 2003
srg 7/8/2018
Hariraman
Kothandaraman
Minor Swamidurai
Muniammal
Sivalochaniammal
P.T. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
