Partly allowed

Sankareswari v. Sivasarasanan

Madras HC7 Mar 2018CRP(MD)/732/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court quashed the interim maintenance component of the Subordinate Judge's order and directed the respondent to pay Rs.10,000 per month towards interim maintenance to the petitioner till the disposal of the main matrimonial proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Quashed interim maintenance in lower court order; directed respondent to pay Rs.10,000/month interim maintenance to petitioner till disposal of HMOP No. 7 of 2016.

Sankareswari Vs Sivasarasanan — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Wednesday, the Seventh day of March, Two Thousand and Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

¶6

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.732 of 2017

¶7

Sankareswari

¶8

... Petitioner/Petitioner/Respondent

¶9

vs.

¶10

Sivasarasanan ... Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner

¶11

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 27.01.2017 passed in I.A.No.56 of 2016 in H.M.O.P.No.7 of 2016 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar.

¶12

DECREE: This Petition coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the grounds of petition, the order of the Lower Court and the material papers in the petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.R.Rajamohan, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.S.Ramasamy, Advocate for the Respondent and this Court, while disposing Civil Revision Petition, doth order and decree as follows:

¶13

(i)that the order and decreetal order of the Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar dated 27.01.2017 made in I.A.No.56 of 2016 in HMOP NO. 7 of 2016 be and hereby is quashed, insofar as the interim maintenance to the petitioner is concerned;

¶14

(ii)that the Respondent herein/petitioner be and hereby is directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) per month towards interim maintenance to the petitioner from the date of filing of the petition in I.A.No.56 of 2016 till the disposal of HMOP No. 7 of 2016:

¶15

(iii)that the order of the Court below be and hereby insofar as the interim maintenance of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand Only)per month awarded to the minor daughter and litigation expenses are concerned, and;

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶18

¶19

¶20

The Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar.

¶21

Copy to:

¶22

The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai(2 Copies)

¶23

+1CC to Mr.R.Rajamohan, Advocate, SR.No. 53472

¶24

ORDER DATED : 07.03.2018

¶25

DECREE

¶26

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.732 of 2017

¶27

Nature of DECREE: While Disposing the Civil Revision Petition preferred against the order and decreetal order of the Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar dated 27.01.2017 made in I.A.No. 56 of 2016 in HMOP No.7 of 2016.

¶28

KK/KKR/SAR 2/27.04.2018/2P/5C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sankareswari v. Sivasarasanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sankareswari v. Sivasarasanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Samadana Sundari Vs Jothi Anthony Santhiyagu

Maheswari Vs R. Thirumalairajan

T. Prabakaran Vs D. Rajagopal

M.Ramlingam, Vs P.Ramesh @ Manickam

M.Parvathi Vs O.Pitchai

Lakshmi, Vs Arumuga Devar