Allowed

J.Shandrasekaran, v. M.Murugaboopathy

Madras HC3 Apr 2018CRP(MD)/724/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 directing the trial Court to decide a suit regarding forged documents and property possession on day-to-day basis within four months without adjournments. Notice was dispensed with as no prejudice would be caused.

What did the court decide?

Directed the trial Court to dispose of the suit on day-to-day basis within four months without adjournments.

J.Shandrasekaran, Vs M.Murugaboopathy — Property and Title | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 03.04.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶6

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.724 of 2018

¶7

J.Shandrasekaran

¶8

S.Jeyapriya ... Petitioners/Plaintiffs

¶9

Vs.

¶10

M.Murugaboopathy

¶11

M.Manohari 3. M.Gayathri 4. J.Senthamarai ... Respondents 1 to 4/Defendants 1 to 4

¶12

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for a direction to the trial Court to decide the O.S.No.277 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Madurai Town on merits and in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.B.Rooban

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs and they filed the suit in O.S.No.277 of 2014 before the District Munsif Court, Madurai Town, praying to declare the registered Document Nos.5405/2007 and 5406/2007 registered with the Tallakulam SubRegistrar Office in respect of the Scheduled mentioned properties as forged documents and the same is null and void and to grant permanent injunction against the defendants and their agents from disturbing the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the scheduled mentioned properties. Now, the petitioners filed the Civil Revision Petition by invoking the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction to direct the trial Court viz., the Principal District Munsif, Madurai Town, to expedite the suit within a time frame manner.

¶16

Considering the nature of the prayer sought for in the Civil Revision Petition, this Court without issuing notice to the respondents, since there is no prejudice would be caused to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondents, on the ground that the petitioners sought for only to expedite the suit, I am inclined to pass the following order:

¶17

¶18

The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Principal District Munsif, Madurai Town, to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.277 of 2014, on day-to-day basis, without giving any adjournment to either parties, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Both the parties are directed to give a fullest co-operation to the early disposal of the suit within the time limit fixed by this Court in the Civil Revision Petition. No costs.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(RTI)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

¶24

The Principal District Munsif, Madurai Town.

¶25

1 cc TO Mr.B.Rooban , Advocate in SR No. 59411

¶26

akv

¶27

AE/JC/SAR1/18.04.2018/2P/3C

¶28

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.724 of 2018 03.04.2018

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J.Shandrasekaran, v. M.Murugaboopathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Shandrasekaran, v. M.Murugaboopathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopinath, Aged 36 Years, Vs State Rep. by

N.Narayana Reddy, M/a 68 Years Vs C.Suresh Babu

Shajahan, M/a 35 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

S.Somasundaram Vs Palanivelu

A.Robi Mohan, S/O.Arulappan, Vs M.Samraj, S/O.Muthunayagam

A. Babu Vs Rajina Stella