The Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution solely for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of representation on the assigned dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.03.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
C.R.P(MD).No.426 of 2018 (PD)
T.Senguttuvan ... Petitioner/Petitioner/ Plaintiff
Vs.
Tiruchirappalli Region,
rep. by Divisional Railway Engineer, Tiruchirappalli.
Tiruchirappalli Region,
rep. by Senior Commercial Manager, Tiruchirappalli.
rep. by Commercial Manager,
Thanjavur Railway Station, Thanjavur. ... Respondents /Respondents / Defendants
PRAYER:- This civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order, dated 04.09.2017, passed by the learned District Munsif, Thanjavur, in I.A.No.87 of 2017 in O.S.No.224 of 2016.
For petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter came up “for admission” on 01.03.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed today ie., on 02.03.2018 under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in
2
prosecuting the matter. Hence, this civil revision petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The District Munsif, Thanjavur.
Gcg
AE/KKR/SAR3/15.03.2018/2P/2C
C.R.P(MD).No.426 of 2018 (PD) 02.03.2018
T.Senguttuvan
The Southern Railway
J.Nisha Banu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
