Kannammal, v. Kalimuthan
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 13.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
CRP(PD)(MD).No. 171 of 2015 in
M.P(MD).No.1 of 2015
1.Kannammal
2.Anbuselvi
3.Kumar
..Petitioners/Plaintiffs
Vs.
Kalimuthan
..Respondent/Defendant
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 227 of Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 09.12.2014 in O.S.No.95 of 2013 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Sivagangai.
For Petitioners :No appearance. For Respondent :Mr.N.Sathish Babu
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 12.04.2018, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners either in person or through their counsel. Thereafter, the case was posted under the caption “for dismissal” on 13.04.2018.
2.Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Crl side)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The District Munsif, Sivagangai.
2
Msa
AE/RSK/SAR1/02.05.2018/2P/4C
CRP(PD)(MD).No. 171 of 2015 in M.P(MD).No.1 of 2015 13.04.2018
Kannammal
Anbuselvi
Kumar
Kalimuthan
M.V.Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court